[boost] Re: Problem with noncopyable in current cvs

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-19 10:49:39

"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:

> As is boost::noncopyable itself. ;-)

Aw, c'mon; it's a trade-off.

  You gain some self-documenting power, save some typing, eliminate the
  possibility of certain errors.

  You lose EBO and add minor coupling.

Anything I missed?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com