From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-19 10:49:39
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:
> As is boost::noncopyable itself. ;-)
Aw, c'mon; it's a trade-off.
You gain some self-documenting power, save some typing, eliminate the
possibility of certain errors.
You lose EBO and add minor coupling.
Anything I missed?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk