From: Pavel Kuznetsov (pavel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-23 16:54:48
> A standard-conforming random access iterator must return value_type&
> from its operator*.
Yes, I know that. It does not relevant here, since
uses the same boost::dereferenceable implementation, and input iterators
are not required to return references, so the problem is still there...
> I don't think we should pump up these old helper templates any more.
> Can you say "iterator_facade?"
Ok, I got your point. But maybe then it might be a good idea to add some
of compile-time assert to boost::dereferenceable<>::operator->()?
-- Pavel Kuznetsov MetaCommunications Engineering http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk