Boost logo

Boost :

From: Robert Bell (belvis_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-25 19:37:09

Mathew Robertson wrote:
> [snip]
>>All what you say here already exists in C++. For instance, you can have
>>a look at QT.
>>It does not use boost::signal (for portability reasons in the beginning,
>>I suppose, and because boost::signal did not exist at that time), but
>>also works with a mechanism of signals and slots that requires some
>>small preprocessing of files..
> Does anyone here think that requiring a pre-compiler is a reasonable thing to require?

Not me. It's one of the things that bothers me the most about Qt.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at