From: Robert Bell (belvis_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-25 19:37:09
Mathew Robertson wrote:
>>All what you say here already exists in C++. For instance, you can have
>>a look at QT.
>>It does not use boost::signal (for portability reasons in the beginning,
>>I suppose, and because boost::signal did not exist at that time), but
>>also works with a mechanism of signals and slots that requires some
>>small preprocessing of files..
> Does anyone here think that requiring a pre-compiler is a reasonable thing to require?
Not me. It's one of the things that bothers me the most about Qt.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk