|
Boost : |
From: Paul A Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-26 09:47:01
| -----Original Message-----
| From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
| [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of tom brinkman
| Sent: 21 August 2004 15:09
| To: boost_at_[hidden]
| Subject: [boost] Review of Daryle Walker's "More IO" library
| What is your evaluation of the design?
No obvious problems that I am qualified to judge.
| What is your evaluation of the implementation?
No obvious problems that I am qualified to judge.
| What is your evaluation of the documentation?
Formal documentation and testing look satisfactory - at a glance.
But the documentation won't sell it to the users
- they MUST have tutorials and EXAMPLES,
even if many of uses appear trivially simple to the cognescenti.
I'd like to see these as a condition of final acceptance.
| What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness of the library?
Useful (some very useful), but filtering elements are potentially even more
valuable.
None that are bad idea - though some more useful than others - subjective?
| Did you try to use the library?
No, but I have used parts previously.
| How much effort did you put into your evaluation?
Minor - a quick re-reading.
| Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain?
Not very - but as a user I feel the need for many items.
| Do you think the library should be accepted as a Boost library?
Yes, but it must work with Jonathan Turkanis's forthcoming further IO
contribution.
Paul
PS In the collection of questions to be answered in reviews,
I feel we could usefully
separately assess the TESTING from the docs.
There is also often a need for both a formal description,
and for user friendly tutorial and examples.
I feel we should be assessing ALL these elements separately.
For many Boost authors, it is not worth producing some of these items
unless one is confident of ultimate acceptance.
Paul A Bristow
Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria UK LA8 8AB
+44 1539 561830 +44 7714 330204
mailto: pbristow_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk