From: Bronek Kozicki (brok_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-26 10:01:45
> On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:34:30 +0400 Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>Bronek Kozicki says he has tracked down the problem for me: adding
>>"<threading>multi" to boost_thread_lib_base and boost_thread_dll_base
>>in libs\boost\thread\build\jamfile fixes the problem.
> To be honest, I know not enough about bjam, but perhaps you could
> ask Bronek Kozicki?
I do not know bjam neither, just playing a little with
libs\thread\test\Jamfile seemed to fix problem with Boost.Threads tests.
However looking at the http://tinyurl.com/6ynh9 I can see something
similar to problem with Boost.Threads (besides list of familiar error
messages). Take a look at list of arguments passed to xilink :
Apparently "libboost_test_exec_monitor.lib" being linked is
singlethreaded, while "libboost_program_options.lib" is multithreaded.
This reasults in two different versions of static CRT being brought into
single excutable, thus error.
Sincerly, when looking at boost\libs\program_options\test\Jamfile I have
no idea how to update it (as I do not know bjam), and I do not have
Intel compiler to play with it. If anyone knows bjam well enough and/or
has Intel compiler, I would suggest seeking for a way to force linking
with multithreaded version of libboost_test_exec_monitor.lib, instead of
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk