[boost] Re: Review Wizard Status Report

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-30 08:54:50

"Jeff Garland" <jeff_at_[hidden]> writes:

> On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 10:00:38 -0700, tom brinkman wrote
>
> Tom --
>
> A couple thoughts.
>
> 1) The review schedule is too aggressive.  One week per review with no breaks
> is going to kill us and not give enough time for complete reviews.  1.5 weeks
> with .5 weeks in-between is more doable.  

Absolutely.  Or a little bit longer.  2 weeks was common in the
past.  If someone's on holiday one week it gives them another week to
do a library review.

> This also gives some buffer for review run-overs.  The current week
> is a reasonable exception because we have 2 libraries that overlap
> the same area.
>
> 2) We might need a break to finish the release, so hopefully there is some
> flexibility in the schedule.
>
> 3) I'm guessing boost::geometry2d isn't really under development...
>
> 4) These periodic reports are great -- keep up the good work!

Hear, hear!

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com