From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-28 19:51:45
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 10:00:38 -0700, tom brinkman wrote
A couple thoughts.
1) The review schedule is too aggressive. One week per review with no breaks
is going to kill us and not give enough time for complete reviews. 1.5 weeks
with .5 weeks in-between is more doable. This also gives some buffer for
review run-overs. The current week is a reasonable exception because we have
2 libraries that overlap the same area.
2) We might need a break to finish the release, so hopefully there is some
flexibility in the schedule.
3) I'm guessing boost::geometry2d isn't really under development...
4) These periodic reports are great -- keep up the good work!
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk