From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-31 13:11:42
tom brinkman <reportbase_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Thomas Wenisch <twenisch_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>> On Sat, 28 Aug 2004, tom brinkman wrote:
>>>> If there are no objections, starting with the "More IO" library, I will
>>>> attach an ID number to each reviewed library. Please reference this ID
>>>> number in any postings to the group. This will help in organizing the
>>>> reviews and assist in searching for related postings.
>>>> The following libraries still require review manager volunteers:
>>>> 10006 - Named Parms
>>>> 10007 - Policy Pointer
>>>> 10008 - Wave
>>>> 10009 - Finite State Machine (FSM)
>>>> 10010 - Fixed Strings
>>> It may not be worth renumbering things at this point, but I would suggest
>>> that you prefix library IDs with the current year rather than an
>>> large number. In otherwords More IO would be 2004-01.
>> What is the point of these IDs? It seems like it adds busywork for
>> reviewers and no especially useful information. Now we're talking
>> about making them more complicated...
> Three Reasons:
> 1) As Review Wizard, I feel that assigning a unique identification number
> to each reviewed library will help me stay organized.
That's good enough for me.
> 2) Helps in searching for related posts.
That's even better.
> 3) As library authors are regularly changing the names of their
?? really ??
I guess I'll take your word for it.
> this will help manage the historical record of the review process.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk