From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-31 17:22:11
Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve wrote:
> I just started a local test run after inserting #include <pyconfig.h> at the
> beginning of prefix.hpp. It will take a few hours before I have all results.
Do you suggest that adding <pyconfig.h> to prefix.hpp instead of
wrap_python.hpp would be the way to go?
>>+// Include the python config file. This has to be done before including any
>>+// system headers because it defines macros which might collide with default
>>+// definitions. Namely these are _OSF_SOURCE, _POSIX_C_SOURCE, and
>>+#if PY_MAJOR_VERSION < 2 || PY_MAJOR_VERSION == 2 && PY_MINOR_VERSION < 2
>>+# include <config.h>
>>+# include <pyconfig.h>
> Boost.Python Version 2 requires Python 2.2 or greater anyway.
What about a check in this file, then? Something like
#if PY_MAJOR_VERSION<2 || PY_MAJOR_VERSION==2 && PY_MINOR_VERSION<2
> I think we should eliminate this complicated construct.
It was taken from further down the file. That should go as well, then.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk