Re: [boost] another bjam question -- and includes search order

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-02 04:44:41

> OK, it's fixed for all toolsets. But since I can't test all toolsets I 
> don't know if my changes will break other things. If they do, it will 
> need to be fixed when that comes up. As a warning the big change was the 
> mixed use of STD headers and system (<sysinclude>) headers.

Excellent, many thanks, that seems to be working fine for me now.
 
> By the way as I changed all the toolsets I noticed that they all set up 
> the includes paths in this order:
> 
> 1. user includes
> 2. standard includes
> 3 system includes (this one I just added to fix the above issue)
> 
> But I would have thought that the order should be:
> 
> 1. standard includes
> 2. system includes
> 3. user includes
> 
> Is this a real problem that should be fixed, or am I just hallucinating?

Hallucinating :-)

No seriously I would expect user-includes to come first.

John.