From: Jonathan Wakely (cow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-02 04:00:01
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 07:41:53PM +0200, Francis ANDRE wrote:
> IMHO, a RMI C++ package should be independent of the underlying transport
> protocol. This last one couldbe abstracted as an iostream like the fstream
> for tcp/udp, one could use a socketstream (SocketC++ or others as starting
> for x25, one could use x25stream
> for pipe/named pipe, one could use pstream (@sourceforge)
For the record, that's pstreams.sf.net with an 'S', not pstream.sf.net
(the latter is a java thingy of some sort)
> for file, one could use fstream
> and so on
> templates are good for this kind of job
> A good friend will come bail you out of jail..........
> but, a true friend....will be sitting next to you saying:
> "...that was fun."
> "Matt Hurd" <matt.hurd_at_[hidden]> a écrit dans le message de
> > >Francis ANDRE <francis.andre_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > > Now that the serialization library is part of boost, could this be a
> item to
> > > add the the wishlist at boost.org???
> > tcp/udp wrapping should probably come first.
> > matt.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk