Re: [boost] Re: RFI: RMI in C++

From: Jonathan Wakely (cow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-02 04:00:01

On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 07:41:53PM +0200, Francis ANDRE wrote:

> IMHO, a RMI C++ package should be independent of the underlying transport
> protocol. This last one couldbe abstracted as an iostream like the fstream
> classes
> 
> for tcp/udp, one could use a socketstream (SocketC++ or others as starting
> point)
> for x25, one could use x25stream
> for pipe/named pipe, one could use pstream (@sourceforge)

For the record, that's pstreams.sf.net with an 'S', not pstream.sf.net
(the latter is a java thingy of some sort)

jon
(pstreams author)

> for file, one could use fstream
> 
> and so on
> 
> templates are good for this kind of job
> 
> FA
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> A good friend will come bail you out of jail..........
> but, a true friend....will be sitting next to you saying:
>  "...that was fun."
> 
> "Matt Hurd" <matt.hurd_at_[hidden]> a écrit dans le message de
> news:8f48d4a04083123442a8464a4_at_mail.gmail.com...
> > >Francis ANDRE <francis.andre_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > > Now that the serialization library is part of boost, could this be a
> item to
> > > add the the wishlist at boost.org???
> >
> > tcp/udp wrapping should probably come first.
> >
> > matt.