|
Boost : |
From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-07 19:28:22
"Jonathan Graehl" <jonathan_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:413E074B.5010408_at_graehl.org...
> For basic_newline_filter (great idea; I hadn't even realized Macintosh
> had yet ANOTHER newline convention), it would be nice to be able to get
> the current line number and possibly even the character number on that
> line, for reporting errors in input.
The is a very good idea. It would be a perfect addition to the text-processing
category.
> I realize this should be possible
> as a separate filter counting '\n' and non-'\n' characters, which
> handles the output of basic_newline_filter, but I don't think the cost
> of maintaining one or two counters would be too much a burden for those
> who don't need it (or if it is, provide versions with and without).
I think it should be a separate filter. The implementation of
basic_newline_filter is already quite baroque. (Check out
http://tinyurl.com/5ct3j.) Using an optimization discussed in another message,
the overhead of a line or character counting filter should be almost zero.
One could even insert line counters at several positions in a filter chain.
> Even nicer would be a call that extracts up to the previous N already
> consumed characters, for even more helpful context (I have already made
> a practice of showing the next N characters to be read in case of a
> fatal error, when the input is a file and not interactive). Obviously
> this could be a filter in its own right, and really has nothing to do
> with basic_newline_filter.
Another good idea. It could use a simple circular buffer.
Jonathan
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk