From: John Torjo (john.lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-09 02:11:55
Thomas Wenisch wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, tom brinkman wrote:
>>With 10-15 days allocated per review and a 5-10 day buffer, we will be able
>>to review at-most 1 to 2 reviews per month or 12 to 24 libraries per year.
> A goal of 24 review per year strikes me as far too ambitious. I think 12
> libraries is a more realistic goal (and allows for some dead time, such as
> right before a release, where no reviews are in progress).
I second that. 12 reviews per year is quite enough.
-- John Torjo -- john_at_[hidden] Contributing editor, C/C++ Users Journal -- "Win32 GUI Generics" -- generics & GUI do mix, after all -- http://www.torjo.com/win32gui/ -- v1.3beta released - check out splitter/simple_viewer, a File Explorer/Viewer all in about 200 lines of code!
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk