Re: [boost] Re: Re: [admin] Overlapping reviews -- should this be allowed?

From: John Torjo (john.lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-09 02:11:55

Thomas Wenisch wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, tom brinkman wrote:
> 
> 
>>With 10-15 days allocated per review and a 5-10 day buffer, we will be able
>>to review at-most 1 to 2 reviews per month or 12 to 24 libraries per year.  
> 
> 
> A goal of 24 review per year strikes me as far too ambitious.  I think 12
> libraries is a more realistic goal (and allows for some dead time, such as
> right before a release, where no reviews are in progress).
> 

I second that. 12 reviews per year is quite enough.

Best,
John

-- 
John Torjo
-- john_at_[hidden]
Contributing editor, C/C++ Users Journal
-- "Win32 GUI Generics" -- generics & GUI do mix, after all
-- http://www.torjo.com/win32gui/
-- v1.3beta released - check out splitter/simple_viewer,
    a File Explorer/Viewer all in about 200 lines of code!