[boost] Re: Re: Re: [admin] Overlapping reviews -- should this beallowed?

From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-09 02:04:48

"John Torjo" <john.lists_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:4140023B.2070608_at_torjo.com...
| Thomas Wenisch wrote:
| > On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, tom brinkman wrote:
| >
| >
| >>With 10-15 days allocated per review and a 5-10 day buffer, we will be
able
| >>to review at-most 1 to 2 reviews per month or 12 to 24 libraries per year.
| >
| >
| > A goal of 24 review per year strikes me as far too ambitious.  I think 12
| > libraries is a more realistic goal (and allows for some dead time, such as
| > right before a release, where no reviews are in progress).
| >
|
| I second that. 12 reviews per year is quite enough.

I would rather see a number that reflects how big the libraries are. Some are
small, some are huge.

br

Thorsten