From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-09 08:22:49
tom brinkman <reportbase_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> tom brinkman <reportbase_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>> With 10-15 days allocated per review and a 5-10 day buffer, we will be
>>> able to review at-most 1 to 2 reviews per month or 12 to 24 libraries per
>> I'm not sure we can handle faster growth than that. Should we be able
> If we added 12 significant libraries in a given year, I'm sure most would
> consider that it had been a successful year.
>> I wonder if enough libraries are going through the preliminary
>> submission/refinement phase outlined at
> Many are not.
That's a problem. I remember the last time I tried to submit a
library for formal review without doing that. Beman said, "aren't you
forgetting something?" Checking that out should be a responsibility
of the Review Wizard.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk