From: Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve (rwgk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-09 12:26:24
--- Toon Knapen <toon.knapen_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve wrote:
> > --- Joaquín Mª López Muñoz <joaquin_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >>MIPSpro tests haven't been updated since Aug 18, yet I see
> >>some recent fixes being done in the CVS for this compiler.
> > We fixed the MIPSpro 7.3 problems only yesterday.
> I ran the regression tests for mipspro 7.4 in the past. But since this
> compiler does not evolve at all anymore and the hardware-line is
> end-of-life we are trying to switch to gcc on this platform: porting
> boost to this platform is too much of a hassle without proper support
> from the vendor.
FWIW: Boost.Python works with both MIPSpro 7.3 and 7.4. The only test that
fails is the embedding test.
MIPSpro 7.4 == EDG 245, a very good front end. It shouldn't really be a problem
to make most things work with this compiler, although it will of course require
some time to work out the fixes. MIPSpro 7.3 == EDG 238 is a different story,
though, quite a nightmare (but not nearly as bad as VC6 which is almost triply
obsolete now (7,7.1,8.0)).
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk