Re: [boost] Formal review of "Output Formatters" library begins today

From: John Torjo (john.lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-14 15:17:03

> 
> The problem with the current implementation naming scheme is that it 
> uses Xfmt consistently and most importantly, *the user has no control 
> over this*. Feel free in your code to use:
>   namespace format = boost::io::format;
> or equivalent. Is there a concensus for/against the use of the shorter 
> fmt::basic(), etc. in the docs and code? Dave? John?

I'd certainly like it, at least in the docs.

Best,
John

-- 
John Torjo
-- john_at_[hidden]
Contributing editor, C/C++ Users Journal
-- "Win32 GUI Generics" -- generics & GUI do mix, after all
-- http://www.torjo.com/win32gui/
-- v1.4.0 - save_dlg - true binding of your data to UI controls!
    + easily add validation rules (win32gui/examples/smart_dlg)