From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-15 12:33:32
"Jeff Flinn" <TriumphSprint2000_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
| "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
| > "Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto_at_[hidden]> writes:
| > I wonder whether it's better to say
| > cbegin(x)
| > or
| > begin(as_const(x))
| > The latter is certainly more general.
| Does this imply that the following would be possible:
| begin( as_reverse(x) )
rbegin(x) is alreeady there as a parallel to x.rbegin().
| begin( as_const( as_reverse(x) ) )
| begin( as_reverse( as_const(x) ) )
yes, I think so with some metaprgramming, but its getting quite hard to read
compared to the single version.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk