[boost] Re: [boost.range] late addition, votes needed

From: Stefan Slapeta (stefan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-16 07:51:10

Peter Dimov wrote:

 > [...]
> There is a vast 
> audience of programmers that value ease of use and consistency above 
> orthogonality.

I second that!

Beside that, I've no problem if both member and free functions are 
provided; I also wouldn't bother if one could write both x.const_rbegin 
_and_ rbegin(as_const(x)). There are good reasons for both.

Stefan