From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-16 06:35:57
David Abrahams wrote:
> Just because the original designers made the mistake of building in
> rbegin() and rend() accessors, it doesn't mean we should perpetuate
> the same mistake for consistency.
I wouldn't call it a mistake. rbegin/rend isolate the user from the somewhat
counter-intuitive notion that rbegin() is obtained from end().
I like the proposed cbegin/crbegin member functions. There is a vast
audience of programmers that value ease of use and consistency above
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk