Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Rene Rivera (grafik.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-19 09:12:21

Next message: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] [Filesystem] Intel 7.1/Linux failures"
Previous message: Rene Rivera: "Re: [boost] Which configurations should be tested?"
In reply to: Reece Dunn: "[boost] old regression results question"
Next in thread: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] old regression results question"
Reply: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] old regression results question"

Reece Dunn wrote:

> On the regression summary page
>
> (http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/boost-regression/developer/summary.html)
>
> there are several instances where a toolset is duplicated (win32+cw-8.3,

The win32+cw-8.3 tests are not duplicates, each is a different
configuration. The Metacomm tests run the usual "debug" variant, while
the RSI tests, the ones I run, use the "release" variant.

-- 
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com - 102708583/icq

Next message: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] [Filesystem] Intel 7.1/Linux failures"
Previous message: Rene Rivera: "Re: [boost] Which configurations should be tested?"
In reply to: Reece Dunn: "[boost] old regression results question"
Next in thread: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] old regression results question"
Reply: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] old regression results question"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk