From: Larry Evans (cppljevans_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-23 15:13:17
On 09/23/2004 02:35 PM, Hartmut Kaiser wrote:
> My point wasn't the concrete syntax, this is volatile at this stage anyway.
> My point was the concept to implement a library, which is 'dual' to Spirit,
> based on the idea, that a grammar describes all possible matchable input
> sequences, so why not use this 'grammar' to specify, how to generate this
> input sequences.
Also, couldn't these 'dual' libraries be used to generate test cases
for each other?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk