From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-29 02:18:55
Vladimir Prus writes:
> Lassi A.Tuura wrote:
>> Slightly related meta-fix I would request once more: please silence all
>> warnings out of boost python binding, at least in the interface users
>> will use. (In fact the same applies to all of boost, but I only recall
>> seeing problems with python bits.)
> Aleksey, is it possible to represent warning in regression test results
Unfortunately, not without hacking "process_jam_log", which we don't
have resources for at this point.
> Missing warning information is the only drawback of the current
> results format.
It's on our todo list.
>> I'd recommend that boost uses the above options + -Werror
>> with GCC to make sure no warnings can creep into the release.
> Maybe, this is a good idea. At least, it will make ignoring warnings
> much harder.
Does Boost.Build provide a feature to enable it accross compilers?
-- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk