Boost logo

Boost :

From: Christoph Ludwig (cludwig_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-29 12:37:23

On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 08:36:37AM -0700, Eric Niebler wrote:
> Joel de Guzman and I, with the help of many smart folks on the
> boost-docs list[*], have been working on improving the look-n-feel of
> Boost's documentation. We're ready to commit the new style, but wanted
> to check here first.
> Volodya was good enough to put up a copy of Boost's docs with the new
> style applied. You can preview them here:
> Please say whether you like the new style or not. If not, be specific
> about why.

I don't want to go into aesthetics, but overall I like it.

However, the W3C HTML validator <URL:> does
not like the pages... I don't know much about BoostBook and how the
HTML pages are generated, but is it possible to add a doctype and fix
the remaining errors? IMHO a group like Boost should aim where
reasonable for code conforming to the respective standards - be it C++
or HTML.




Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at