Boost logo

Boost :

From: Larry Evans (cppljevans_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-30 07:11:27

On 09/30/2004 02:04 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote:

>>My goal is to provide a fully standard compliant C++ parser
>>with C++ and python APIs to access the processing pipeline
>>as well as the abstract syntax tree for maximum power and flexibility.
> Count me as interested. Are you going to base that parser on OpenC++, which,

Me too!

> IIRC, was used by Synopsis some time ago? Last time a looked at OpenC++, it
> did not even distinguish between ordinary names and typenames, which makes me
> wonder if it's a good parser.

I recall mention of pccts or antlr as a successor on the synopsis
mailing list. Is that still true, or would you consider maybe
spirit 2?

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at