From: Larry Evans (cppljevans_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-30 07:11:27
On 09/30/2004 02:04 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
>>My goal is to provide a fully standard compliant C++ parser
>>with C++ and python APIs to access the processing pipeline
>>as well as the abstract syntax tree for maximum power and flexibility.
> Count me as interested. Are you going to base that parser on OpenC++, which,
> IIRC, was used by Synopsis some time ago? Last time a looked at OpenC++, it
> did not even distinguish between ordinary names and typenames, which makes me
> wonder if it's a good parser.
I recall mention of pccts or antlr as a successor on the synopsis
mailing list. Is that still true, or would you consider maybe
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk