Re: [boost] [Random] GCC 2.95.3 regressions

From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-30 20:06:04

Michael Stevens writes:
>> Aleksey Gurtovoy writes:
>> > 
>> > Given that the code compiles with the latests versions of the
>> > compiler, the following (from http://tinyurl.com/58lll) is most likely
>> > to be a compiler bug, but since the test used to pass some time ago, I
>> > was wondering if anyone is interested in making it work again or simply
>> > commenting on it before I mark it green:
>> 
>> [snip errors]
>> 
>> OK, seems like nobody is interested in these, marked up as
>> expected.
>
> I took a quick look. It seems like gcc-2.95 has namespace problems
> when BOOST_USING_STD_MIN/MAX Since Random never worked on systems
> without min/max in std I have simplified and use std::min/max
> instead. This fixes gcc-2.95 and should not regress on any of the
> good compilers.
>
> If this looks good in the tests tomorrow I will remove the failure
> markup.

Thank you, Michael!

-- 
Aleksey Gurtovoy
MetaCommunications Engineering