From: Dave Harris (brangdon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-01 16:48:51
joel_at_[hidden] (Joel) wrote (abridged):
> Serif or sans serif?
> For continuous reading in print, serif fonts are generally more
> readable than sans serif. However, on the web, the opposite is true.
> Serifs are tiny, subtle strokes which, on screen in a small size,
> become a rather crude series of little square bitmaps. Their absence
> makes the font more readable.
On my 1280x1024 desktop machine, the serif on the middle bar of my default
Times New Roman 'F' is drawn with 12 pixels and 4 different colours. Maybe
the studies you cite were done before anti-aliasing was common?
Regardless, I think it should be up to the user.
-- Dave Harris, Nottingham, UK
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk