From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-05 10:07:44
>> While adding failure markups, I noticed that the Optional library is
>> shown as failing with true64cxx. However, looking at the error I can see
>> that it is using an older version of the library (one which indeed is
>> defective) I'm also seeing similar results for this toolset and the
>> Numeric Conversion Library.
> How long since the fix has been in the CVS?
I'm also seeing what I believe are out of date failures for regex on this
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk