From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-05 08:16:03
Fernando Cacciola wrote:
> While adding failure markups, I noticed that the Optional library is
> shown as failing with true64cxx. However, looking at the error I can see
> that it is using an older version of the library (one which indeed is
> defective) I'm also seeing similar results for this toolset and the
> Numeric Conversion Library.
How long since the fix has been in the CVS?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk