Boost logo

Boost :

From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-05 08:16:03

Fernando Cacciola wrote:

> While adding failure markups, I noticed that the Optional library is
> shown as failing with true64cxx. However, looking at the error I can see
> that it is using an older version of the library (one which indeed is
> defective) I'm also seeing similar results for this toolset and the
> Numeric Conversion Library.

How long since the fix has been in the CVS?


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at