Boost logo

Boost :

From: Stefan Slapeta (stefan_nospam__at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-08 17:38:15

Beman Dawes wrote:


> That was meant read:
> buf.actime = std::time(0)

funny :)

> Now, it may be a poor design to update actime to the current time. It
> might be better to do a stat(), and get st_atime, and then use that.
> Opinions?

IMO the really poor design is that of ::utime which forces you to set
both the access time and the write time in the same call;
I'm afraid you have no choice but to determine the actual access time
before (as you suggested) :(


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at