Re: [boost] Re: [filesystem] Failures on FAT32

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-09 15:33:23

At 06:38 PM 10/8/2004, Stefan Slapeta wrote:
 >Beman Dawes wrote:
 >
 >[...]
 >
 >> That was meant read:
 >>
 >>         buf.actime = std::time(0)
 >>
 >
 >funny :)
 >
 >>
 >> Now, it may be a poor design to update actime to the current time. It
 >> might be better to do a stat(), and get st_atime, and then use that.
 >> Opinions?
 >>
 >
 >IMO the really poor design is that of ::utime which forces you to set
 >both the access time and the write time in the same call;

Yes, that's for sure.

 >I'm afraid you have no choice but to determine the actual access time
 >before (as you suggested) :(

I've committed the changes to CVS.

Thanks,

--Beman