Boost logo

Boost :

From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-09 11:29:01

Fernando Cacciola wrote:

> While adding failure markups, I noticed that the Optional library is
> shown as failing with true64cxx. However, looking at the error I can
> see that it is using an older version of the library (one which
> indeed is defective)

I just uploaded a new regression run. All tests are passing now for

> I'm also seeing similar results for this toolset and the Numeric
> Conversion Library

There is on failure left in the numeric conversion library. Is that what
you would expect?


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at