[boost] Re: true64cxx regresion reports

From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-09 11:29:01

Fernando Cacciola wrote:

> While adding failure markups, I noticed that the Optional library is
> shown as failing with true64cxx. However, looking at the error I can
> see that it is using an older version of the library (one which
> indeed is defective)

I just uploaded a new regression run. All tests are passing now for 
tru64cxx65.

> I'm also seeing similar results for this toolset and the Numeric
> Conversion Library

There is on failure left in the numeric conversion library. Is that what 
you would expect?

Markus