Re: [boost] uBLAS results for vc7.1 too good to be true?

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-10 12:42:32

At 08:55 AM 10/10/2004, Bronek Kozicki wrote:
 >http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/boost-regression/developer/numeric-ubla
 >s_release.html
 >(http://tinyurl.com/3vmlv ) Almost all results for vc7.1 are marked
 >"unexpected success". I think this compiler is around for enough long
 >time to mark these results as "just expected" success?

IIRC, 7.1 is compliant enough that we should expect 100% success. While 
there are some namespace and other issues, we've been able to find fairly 
simple workarounds at least for the case I've seen.

--Beman