From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-11 04:42:27
Howard Hinnant wrote:
> On Oct 9, 2004, at 8:46 AM, Dave Harris wrote:
>> The second is a container of values which may be polymorphic. It would
>> a more-or-less drop-in replacement for vector<T>. It would not allow
>> nulls, and the syntax would be like v.begin()->method(). Although it
>> probably use pointers behind the scenes, that would be an
>> detail not revealed by its interface.
> I.e. a vector<T&> ?
Right! I'd often miss such a container, because I'd prefer references
everywhere, but for vectors I need to use pointers. I supposed that
ptr_vector with non-owning policy is exactly like vector<T&>.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk