Re: [boost] [review] Formal review of the Smart Container library

From: Howard Hinnant (hinnant_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-09 17:07:21

On Oct 9, 2004, at 8:46 AM, Dave Harris wrote:

> The second is a container of values which may be polymorphic. It would 
> be
> a more-or-less drop-in replacement for vector<T>. It would not allow
> nulls, and the syntax would be like v.begin()->method(). Although it 
> would
> probably use pointers behind the scenes, that would be an 
> implementation
> detail not revealed by its interface.

I.e. a vector<T&> ?

-Howard