From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-18 06:40:57
Maxim Yegorushkin wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 23:44:42 +0100, Reece Dunn <msclrhd_at_[hidden]>
>> Jeff Garland wrote:
>>> On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 22:00:52 +0400, Maxim Yegorushkin wrote
>>>> Recent postings showed interest in an immutable string facility
>>>> [*]. Its interface and implementation has now reached a stable
>>>> state (I hope).
>>>> I am formally requesting that const_string be added to the review
>>> Wasn't there some discussion of merging this proposal with the
>>> stuff and reviewing it together -- looks like that's been decided
>> I haven't heard anything against the merger.
> Neither did I.
If you want to hear a voice against the merger, I will be glad to respond.
Can't speak for others, but I'd like to see the specifications of the
components first, before going ahead with a merger, which can obscure things
Obviously, every std::string replacement might need to provide a number of
boilerplate member functions that can be expressed in terms of a more
primitive interface, and this functionality can be implemented as a reusable
component. But this is not a merger. It's plain old reuse.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk