[boost] Re: [Formal review request] const_string

From: Maxim Yegorushkin (e-maxim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-18 01:07:49

On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 23:44:42 +0100, Reece Dunn <msclrhd_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Jeff Garland wrote:
>> On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 22:00:52 +0400, Maxim Yegorushkin wrote
>>
>>> Recent postings showed interest in an immutable string facility [*].  
>>> Its  interface and implementation has now reached a stable state (I  
>>> hope).
>>>
>>> I am formally requesting that const_string be added to the review  
>>> queue.
>>  Wasn't there some discussion of merging this proposal with the  
>> fixed_string
>> stuff and reviewing it together -- looks like that's been decided  
>> against?
>
> I haven't heard anything against the merger.

Neither did I.

> I am pro merger, since it will allow const_string, fixed_string and  
> flex_string/basic_string_impl to all be reviewed as one since they have  
> related functionality.

So, what specific steps should we make to merge it?

-- 
Maxim Yegorushkin