From: Maxim Yegorushkin (e-maxim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-18 01:07:49
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 23:44:42 +0100, Reece Dunn <msclrhd_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Jeff Garland wrote:
>> On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 22:00:52 +0400, Maxim Yegorushkin wrote
>>> Recent postings showed interest in an immutable string facility [*].
>>> Its interface and implementation has now reached a stable state (I
>>> I am formally requesting that const_string be added to the review
>> Wasn't there some discussion of merging this proposal with the
>> stuff and reviewing it together -- looks like that's been decided
> I haven't heard anything against the merger.
Neither did I.
> I am pro merger, since it will allow const_string, fixed_string and
> flex_string/basic_string_impl to all be reviewed as one since they have
> related functionality.
So, what specific steps should we make to merge it?
-- Maxim Yegorushkin
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk