From: Aaron W. LaFramboise (aaronrabiddog51_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-18 23:31:03
Roland Schwarz wrote:
> This is not exactly what I mean. I was thinking morealong the lines of a
> remote procedure call mechanism.
As far as I know, this isn't possible, but its on my #2 on my signals
wishlist after #1, thread safety.
One way I could see this sort of thing implemented is similar to how a
quality standard C++ library implements contrainers that can be shared
between two processes: the signal class would be parameterized by an
allocator, and only use storage that is a member of the class or that
has been all allocated with this allocator. This would permit you to
just pass it a shared memory allocator and allocate the Signal class
itself in shared memory, and have everything "just work."
Aaron W. LaFramboise
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk