From: Neal D. Becker (ndbecker2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-19 14:28:47
Robert Ramey wrote:
> Still, to fully support this idea, changes in the library would be
> to update some internal structures when a DLL is unloaded.
I don't see unload/reload as a requirement. I think this use case would be
pretty obscure. What semantics would you even expect in that case? I
would be really happy if we at least make the common case work.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk