[boost] Re: serialization - build shared libs

From: Neal D. Becker (ndbecker2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-19 14:28:47

Robert Ramey wrote:

[...]
> Still, to fully support this idea, changes in the library would be
> required
> to update some internal structures when  a DLL is unloaded.  

I don't see unload/reload as a requirement.  I think this use case would be
pretty obscure.  What semantics would you even expect in that case?  I
would be really happy if we at least make the common case work.