Boost logo

Boost :

From: Neal D. Becker (ndbecker2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-19 14:28:47

Robert Ramey wrote:

> Still, to fully support this idea, changes in the library would be
> required
> to update some internal structures when a DLL is unloaded.

I don't see unload/reload as a requirement. I think this use case would be
pretty obscure. What semantics would you even expect in that case? I
would be really happy if we at least make the common case work.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at