Re: [boost] Re: [Q]: What is the recommended logging facility for boost: log4cpp or ??

From: John Torjo (john.lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-22 13:40:23

Francis ANDRE wrote:

> I have asked to the owner of log4cpp if he would be interested in putting
> log4cpp in the boost foundry (sandbox first for sure) with a change from the
> LGPL licence to the boost one.
> 

To me, log4cpp seems way too complex and just modeled after the Java way.

Of course, this is just my very subjective oppinion ;)

Best,
John

-- 
John Torjo,    Contributing editor, C/C++ Users Journal
-- "Win32 GUI Generics" -- generics & GUI do mix, after all
-- http://www.torjo.com/win32gui/
-- v1.5 - tooltips at your fingertips (work for menus too!)
    + bitmap buttons (work for MessageBox too!)
    + tab dialogs, hyper links, lite html