[boost] Re: Re: [Q]: What is the recommended logging facility for boost: log4cpp or ??

From: Neal D. Becker (ndbecker2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-22 13:27:36

John Torjo wrote:

> Francis ANDRE wrote:
> 
>> I have asked to the owner of log4cpp if he would be interested in putting
>> log4cpp in the boost foundry (sandbox first for sure) with a change from
>> the LGPL licence to the boost one.
>> 
> 
> To me, log4cpp seems way too complex and just modeled after the Java way.
> 
> Of course, this is just my very subjective oppinion ;)
> 

I agree.