From: Francis ANDRE (francis.andre_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-22 15:27:31
> John Torjo wrote:
> > Francis ANDRE wrote:
> >> I have asked to the owner of log4cpp if he would be interested in
> >> log4cpp in the boost foundry (sandbox first for sure) with a change
> >> the LGPL licence to the boost one.
> > To me, log4cpp seems way too complex and just modeled after the Java
> > Of course, this is just my very subjective oppinion ;)
> I agree.
About complexity, I have no other reference in c++ except in house boring
and tedious package...but using log4cpp was quite simple in term of
integration. So I do not quite agree with the "complexity" argument....
On the "Java way", I do not matter if the design comes from Java
ofrSmalltalk or Eiffel or whatsoever if it does the job!!!.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk