[boost] Re: [Q]: What is the recommended logging facility for boost: log4cpp or ??

From: Pavel Vozenilek (pavel_vozenilek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-22 19:53:05

"Rene Rivera" wrote:

> Compilers tend to eliminate unused code very effectively.
>
BCB doesn't.  And what if logging code relies on
debug only members/functions?

> > Personally, having debugging log statements completely disappear
> > from the source code in a release build is more comforting,
> > even if it involves a macro.
>
Very true.

> It's comforting in an old style sense :-) But I prefer to limit macro
> use as it interferes with debugging.
>
Debug support w/o macros may
not be useable in many real projects.

/Pavel