From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-22 19:35:16
> > John Torjo <john.lists_at_[hidden]> writes:
> I take back "Accepted by default", since is a bit confusing, sorry for
> Here's what I mean:
> it's clear that people want such a library, and a lot of positive
> feedback was received. I know the library cannot be accepted at this time.
I think the review process is close to as good as it can practically
expected to be.
In this particular case, I think that to small things sort of clouded the
a) The reference to the "vote" which over emphasizes the "voting" aspect.
In the future I think it would be better to use the term "recommend"
b) the "Accepted by default",
I think this particular situation could have been handled better with
"the library is not accepted at this time"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk