From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-07 19:29:48
Peter Dimov wrote:
> Valentin Samko wrote:
>>> The CG literature I've read uniformly treated points and
>>> vectors as different beasts.
>> I am not a CG expert, so I do not know why this is so in CG
>> literature, probably this approach is more convenient to describe
>> some CG problems. I am only familiar with dimensionality reduction
>> aspects of CG, which treat points and vectors as the same beasts.
> That's because in CG...
Oops. Ambiguous CG. Computer Graphics versus Computational Geometry?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk