Re: [boost] [Review] Named parameters library

From: E. Gladyshev (eegg_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-13 03:12:14

Doug Gregor wrote:
> 
> As always, please remember to clearly state whether you believe the 
> library should be accepted into Boost.
> 

The library is a good start but I don't think that
it should be accepted w/o a native support for
named parameters functors. The macros are not good enough.

Eugene