[boost] Re: [Review] Named parameters library

From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-13 18:02:47

David Abrahams wrote:

> I don't see why not.  What am I missing?
> Anyway, it's surely possible to make a BOOST_NAMED_PARAMS_MEMBER_FUN
> if neccessary.

I think it isn't working because the implementation function is declared 
twice in class body. So BOOST_NAMED_PARAMS_MEMBER_FUN should drop the 
forward declaration. You'll probably also need a 
BOOST_NAMED_PARAMS_CONST_MEMBER_FUN. I don't think there's a nice 
solution for constructors.

Daniel