From: Daniel Wallin (dalwan01_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-13 18:06:39
Rene Rivera wrote:
> Daniel James wrote:
>> David Abrahams wrote:
>>> This approach is superior to bgl_named_params in part because it
>>> avoids undue coupling and dependency in a library design. That
>>> coupling is discussed in depth in this excerpt from C++ Template
>>> Metaprogramming (http://www.boost-consulting.com/mplbook):
>> This coupling could be avoided by using an overloaded operator to
>> combine the arguments, for example:
>> f(slew(.799) | name("z"));
>> An advantage of this method is that it avoids the need for the
>> forwarding functions.
> I was just going over the library and have a related question. Is there
> a rational as to why the forwarding functions where used instead of
> overloading the "," operator?
operator, *is* overloaded. It's just that if you use it you have to:
(1) Add additional parameters around the parameter list.
(2) Only use named parameters, position gets no meaning.
-- Daniel Wallin
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk