From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-14 05:56:06
David Abrahams wrote:
> Daniel James <daniel_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>An advantage of this method is that it avoids the need for the
> But the disadvantage of these schemes is that you lose the positional
> interface to f. Now you're forced to use named parameters.
Personally, I'd prefer not requiring the forwarding functions. The
positional interface doesn't seem that useful. If it was then you
wouldn't need the named parameters. But I realise that this is a fairly
Of course, you could create a positional interface by using a forwarding
function. But that defeats the point.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk