From: Rogier van Dalen (rogiervd_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-16 09:42:52
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 13:32:46 -0500, Doug Gregor <dgregor_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Why not keep all of the Boost versions in namespace boost, but create a
> boost::tr1 namespace that has the appropriate using declarations for
> the std versions (when a TR1 implementation is available) or the Boost
> versions (when a TR1 implementation is not available). If we're feeling
> really brave we could eventually call the boost:: versions deprecated
What is the policy anyway with regards to boost components that are in
TR1? Are their interfaces now fixed to the TR1 ones?
For example, there was a discussion recently on constructing
boost::function's with constant values.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk